Temu驳回MF Doom遗产管理人提起的假冒商品诉讼，称对独立卖家不承担责任

电商巨头Temu正在致力于反驳已故说唱歌手兼制作人MF Doom遗产管理人提出的关于假冒商品的诉讼。该公司主张，其平台上独立的中国卖家的行为并不应由该平台本身承担法律责任。

Temu的法律代表强调，该公司的商业模式清楚地指明，商品的销售权归属于中国的独立第三方卖家。他们辩称，Temu仅提供一个中介平台，因此，根据现行的知识产权法律，平台方不应对第三方卖家的侵权行为承担直接的法律责任。

此外，Temu还提到，MF Doom遗产管理方试图主张对已故艺术家肖像权的所有权。然而，依据英国法律，死后肖像权并不被承认，而MF Doom于2020年在英国去世，这使得这一主张更加复杂。

在法律文件中，Temu的律师表示：“在接到诉状后，Temu迅速启动了内部调查。基于审慎原则，并遵循知识产权相关政策，Temu并非承认Gas Drawls的指控成立，而是根据对方提供的低质量截图，主动下架了所有能够识别的相关商品。”

这一事件引发了关于电商平台法律责任的重要讨论。在当今网络购物日益普及的时代，如何平衡消费者保护与平台责任，成为了一个颇具争议的议题。Temu的辩护不仅关乎自身的法律地位，也为整个电商行业在类似事件中的应对策略提供了借鉴。

E-commerce giant Temu is seeking to rebut a lawsuit brought by the estate of the late rapper and producer MF Doom over counterfeit goods, arguing that it should not be held legally responsible for the actions of independent Chinese sellers on its platform.

The legal representative of Temu emphasized that the company's business model clearly states that the sales rights of goods belong to independent third-party sellers in China. They argued that Temu only provides an intermediary platform, and therefore, according to the current intellectual property laws, the platform should not bear direct legal responsibility for the infringement actions of third-party sellers.

In addition, Temu mentioned that the estate management of MF Doom attempted to claim ownership of the deceased artist's portrait rights. However, according to British law, portrait rights are not recognized after death, and MF Doom passed away in the UK in 2020, which further complicates this claim.

In the legal document, Temu's lawyer stated: "Upon receiving the complaint, Temu promptly initiated an internal investigation. Based on the principle of prudence and in accordance with intellectual property policies, Temu did not admit to the validity of Gas Drawls' allegations. Instead, based on the low-quality screenshots provided by the other party, Temu proactively removed all identifiable related products.". ”

This incident has sparked significant discussions on the legal responsibilities of e-commerce platforms. In today's era where online shopping is increasingly prevalent, balancing consumer protection and platform responsibilities has become a highly controversial topic. Temu's defense not only concerns its own legal status but also provides insights for the entire e-commerce industry on how to respond in similar incidents.